guide:implementation:facilitation
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
guide:implementation:facilitation [2018/11/05 15:51] Cecilia |
guide:implementation:facilitation [2019/04/01 19:19] (current) Marina [Ατομικές συνεντεύξεις ως εργαλείο για να συντροφέψετε ανθρώπους έξω από τη ζώνη άνεσης τους] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 167: | Line 167: | ||
| * **try to write down any comment you might hear** to get a better idea of how some individuals feel (“I’m bored”, “I can use this tool at home!”, “I need a smoke”, “We said this already”, “What is on the menu for lunch?”). | * **try to write down any comment you might hear** to get a better idea of how some individuals feel (“I’m bored”, “I can use this tool at home!”, “I need a smoke”, “We said this already”, “What is on the menu for lunch?”). | ||
| - | Use tools such as "**Speech report**" to keep track of what you observe and share it with your team-mates in your next team meeting. | + | You should **keep a log** of the comments, attitudes and level of comitment of the participants throughout the activities of the day so you can keep track of what you’ve observed and share it with your team-mates during the next meeting. |
| - | If you intend to learn more about each participant, especially their expectations and previous community living experiences, it might be worth **observing each person’s behavior within the group** and **link it with their “profile”**. | + | If you intend to learn more about how one participant in particular is affected by the Tour it might be worth **observing this person’s behavior within the group** while taking into account **their initial expectations and previous community living experiences**. |
| For example :\\ | For example :\\ | ||
| - | Person A is new to community living. He hasn’t talked much on day one. On day 7, he asked several questions and made a suggestion. On day 15 he was speaking a lot more, making suggestions and clarifying topics for the group. It seems the Tour managed to raise his confidence within the group.\\ | + | **Person A** is new to community living. He hasn’t talked much on day one. On day 7, he asked several questions and made a suggestion. On day 15 he was speaking a lot more, making suggestions and clarifying topics for the group. It seems the Tour managed to raise his confidence within the group.\\ |
| - | Person B is experienced in community living. On day one, she was participating a lot, and making many suggestions. On day 7, she participated a bit less and asked more questions. On day 15 she was making suggestions again and clarifying things for the group. We can suggest that she had a preconceived idea of what the Tour should look like thanks to her past experience, but was open to reconsider it – she trusted the organization team and the group and got invested even more in the end. You managed to gain her trust… How? That’s when interviews can help...\\ | + | **Person B** is experienced in community living. On day one, she was participating a lot, and making many suggestions. On day 7, she participated a bit less and asked more questions. On day 15 she was making suggestions again and clarifying things for the group. We can suggest that she had a preconceived idea of what the Tour should look like thanks to her past experience, but was open to reconsider it – she trusted the organization team and the group and got invested even more in the end. You managed to gain her trust… How? That’s when interviews can help...\\ |
| - | ===== Individual interviews as a tool to accompany people out of their confort zone ===== | + | =====Individual interviews as a tool to accompany people out of their confort zone===== |
| ==== A " 'you' time" to better understand the participants' background, motivations and emotional state ==== | ==== A " 'you' time" to better understand the participants' background, motivations and emotional state ==== | ||
| Line 226: | Line 225: | ||
| ==== A pedagogical issue ==== | ==== A pedagogical issue ==== | ||
| - | Making the group deciding might be challenging, but it is worth it. The Tour is about **discovering that a group of people has needs**, just like a person does, that **are not the addition of the individuals needs**. | + | Having the group decide might be challenging, but it is worth it. The Tour is about **discovering that a group of people has needs**, just like a person does, that **are not the addition of the individuals needs**. |
| {{:guide:implementation:p1080547.jpg?direct&230 |}} | {{:guide:implementation:p1080547.jpg?direct&230 |}} | ||
| Line 248: | Line 247: | ||
| Only then can you start a decision making process with the method of your choice. | Only then can you start a decision making process with the method of your choice. | ||
| - | ==== Chose the right method ==== | + | ==== Choose the right method ==== |
| Last but not least, think carefully which will be the best decision-making method for the specific issue you want to deal with. For example don't apply sociocraty or Consensum on an issue that doesn't really matter. It is a long process and people will get bored if nothing important is at stake. | Last but not least, think carefully which will be the best decision-making method for the specific issue you want to deal with. For example don't apply sociocraty or Consensum on an issue that doesn't really matter. It is a long process and people will get bored if nothing important is at stake. | ||
guide/implementation/facilitation.1541429491.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/11/05 15:51 by Cecilia
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
